Which statement best describes what must accompany an application as evidence?

Which statement best describes what must accompany an application as evidence?

• A. It must set out the factual information in support on the application notice itself and sign the statement of truth.
• B. It must be accompanied only by a letter from the client.
• C. It is sufficient to rely on a general affidavit without a signed statement of truth.
• D. It need only include a brief summary of damages with no signature.

Answer: (A)

When you apply to court, the evidence must be attached in a way that the court can see the factual basis for the relief you seek, and it must be verified. The facts that support the application should be set out on the application notice itself, and there must be a signed statement of truth confirming those facts. This combination provides a clear, verifiable record for the judge to assess the merits of the application without having to dig for separate documents, and it holds the applicant personally to the truth of what is stated. Why this is the best fit: the application notice serves as the immediate document guiding the court on the basis for the relief sought, so including the factual information there ensures the court has the necessary support upfront. The signed statement of truth attaches a formal verification to those facts, which helps prevent frivolous or misleading applications and can have consequences if the statements are proved untrue. A letter from the client alone would not meet the formal evidentiary standard the court requires. Relying on a general affidavit without a signed statement of truth fails because the affidavit must be accompanied by a statement confirming its truth, and a mere summary without a signature does not provide verified factual support.

When you apply to court, the evidence must be attached in a way that the court can see the factual basis for the relief you seek, and it must be verified. The facts that support the application should be set out on the application notice itself, and there must be a signed statement of truth confirming those facts. This combination provides a clear, verifiable record for the judge to assess the merits of the application without having to dig for separate documents, and it holds the applicant personally to the truth of what is stated.

Why this is the best fit: the application notice serves as the immediate document guiding the court on the basis for the relief sought, so including the factual information there ensures the court has the necessary support upfront. The signed statement of truth attaches a formal verification to those facts, which helps prevent frivolous or misleading applications and can have consequences if the statements are proved untrue.

A letter from the client alone would not meet the formal evidentiary standard the court requires. Relying on a general affidavit without a signed statement of truth fails because the affidavit must be accompanied by a statement confirming its truth, and a mere summary without a signature does not provide verified factual support.